In September 2022, a news story garnered widespread attention. According to the report, a deceased resident in Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, China, had his health code and COVID-19 test records continue to update even after their death. This incident quickly sparked discussions on social media, with people questioning the reliability and accuracy of the COVID-19 testing system.
In the days following the resident’s death, his health code still showed green, and his COVID-19 test records were still being updated. The family expressed confusion and anger over this, questioning the negligence of the relevant authorities. After the media exposed the incident, the authorities promptly launched an investigation and claimed that it was an isolated case caused by a system error, not a widespread issue.
“Exam adjustment, job adjustment, even children can be reassigned under the name of ‘social adjustment’ by the authorities. In 1990, a couple from Quanzhou, Guangxi, had their 1-year-old son taken away. Thirty-two years later, a notice from the local Health Commission responded by saying that the child had been taken away for ‘social adjustment,’ causing an uproar on the internet.
Tang Yueying, now 69, and her husband Deng Zhensheng had four sons and three daughters. Their youngest child, born in 1989, would be 33 years old if still alive. Tang Yueying told Huashang News that she was staying in a hotel in Quanzhou County with her 15-year-old daughter and 1-year-old son when three women and two men suddenly took her son from her. The couple searched for 32 years but found no results. They went to the local government’s petition department to request an investigation into the abduction. On July 5 this year, a notice from the Quanzhou County Health Commission titled ‘Notice of Non-Acceptance of Petition Matters’ circulated online. It stated that the couple’s child, being the seventh child which violated the population control policy, was taken away for ‘social adjustment’ by the county, and that there was no child trafficking involved. The notice also mentioned that no records were kept regarding the whereabouts of the children taken for social adjustment and that the petition matter would not be processed.
Moreover, the notice mentioned that given the severe population control situation in the 1990s, the policy of ‘controlling population quantity and improving population quality’ was strictly enforced. The decision to reassign one of the children was made by the county committee and government based on the severe family planning work situation at the time.
Treating children as commodities, is openly illegal under the guise of a county committee and government decision, legitimizing human trafficking behavior.
The Truth Of China 